“Best” Form of Music to Learn is in Eye of Beholder

Steve Burks
Many beginning musicians feel obligated to seek out classical training because they have been told that it’s the “best” training to get. Yet, the people who claim that classical training is the best haven’t operationally defined the word. What’s “best” about this form of training?
- That you like it?
- That it teaches the music your parents or teachers liked?
- Are you approaching “best” in music as “best” in sports, such that the only criterion recognized for best is psychomotor difficulty in performance (ie, how fast a passage is, how complex it is, and how long it took you to learn it)?
- Does the “best” music come from a musician who looks like you? (A fellow alumnus calls that “listening with your eyes.”)
- Do we mean best to perform? Or best to hear?
- Do you believe that the best music was invented by Westerners?
- Is a harmonic minor scale “better” than a blues scale?
Here are my definitions of “best:”
- The best training is in the type of music you want to learn.
- The best music to learn is whatever kind enables you to do the following (this from a former professor of mine): (a) play anything you can read
(b) read anything you can play
(c) play anything you can hear (aurally identify)
(d) hear anything you can play
(e) read anything you can hear, and my personal favorite
(f) hear anything you can read.
The best reason to study classical music is because you like it and want to play it. It will not, however, give you the tools to compose music (unless you specifically study composition); it will not teach you the concepts you need to play by ear; nor will it teach you how to use scales in improvisation.
Classical training focuses mainly on three things: reading music; technical expertise, ie, making as few mistakes as possible; and sightreading. If you want to learn 2a through 2f above, you will need to study jazz or other forms of contemporary music. George Duke put it all this way: “The technique is not the music.”
Steve Burks is a graduate of the Indiana University Jacobs School of Music. Currently, he’s a vocalist and keyboardist in the International House of Blues Foundation’s “Blues School House,” a live musical presentation for 5th through 12th graders that traces the history of blues music and its influence on other forms of contemporary music.






3 comments
Posted 01/04/10 at 1:22 am
Steve’s post was inspired by a spirited conversation on the Facebook fan page about this post by Chuck: http://www.musicafter50.com/2009/08/studying-classical-guitar-leads-to-playing-classical-guitar/
Posted 01/04/10 at 8:29 am
A huge number of late starters play traditional genres of music – Celtic, Appalachian, French-Canadian or New Breton, western swing, etc. Jazz is only one facet of non-classical music. One intereting aspect of jazz advocates is that they endlessly promote the influence of jazz on non-western music out rarely explore the influence of western music on jazz.- but that is a missed opportunity since for a lot of people the cultural aspects of traditional genres are what make them appealing, hence the huge popularity of bluegrass, cajun, swing and other similar festivals where large numbers of the attendees are amateur players.
Posted 01/04/10 at 9:52 am
Bravo. After all, what is playing music about unless its the joy of self-expression. The point is …Play Something. Dig in and get involved. At 53 I have rejoined my youth through playing again. If its fun, its therapy. If it’s not fun….its a burden. Play what you enjoy, and it will come from the soul.
Leave a Comment